8 Tex. 115
Decided July 1, 1852
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1852-07-01
<p>It is the well-settled law of the court that where there was no motion for a new trial the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that the verdict was not warranted by the evidence.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1852-07-01
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1980
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The record in this ease discloses no ruling of the court upon any question of law. The sole question is whether the verdict of the jury was warranted by the evidence. There was no motion for a new trial; and it is tlie settled law of the court that where there was no motion for a new trial the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that tho verdict was not warranted by the evidence. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
¶2Judgment affirmed.