Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Va. App. 60 - Hill v. Commonwealth

8 Va. App. 60 - Hill v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2020

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

14019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holloway v. Arkansas · Scharffe v. Perkins · Barrett v. United States · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Infelice v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence of the physical appearance of the substance involved in the transaction, evidence that the substance produced the expected effects when sampled by someone familiar with the illicit drug, evidence that the substance was used in the same manner as the illicit drug, testimony that a high price was paid in case for the substance, evidence that the transactions involving the substance were carried on with secrecy or deviousness, and evidence that the substance was called by the name of the illegal narcotic by the defendant or others in his presence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Users and addicts, if they have gained a familiarity or experience with a drug, may identify it. Numerous courts have permitted lay purchasers of drugs to testify as to the identification of drugs after previous use has been demonstrated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.