Murillo v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 5108 · 38 U.S.C. § 7101 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Rosler v. Derwinski · Mayer v. Brown · Patterson v. Brown · Glynn v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the Court to base its review on documents not included in the Board's calculus at the time it rendered its decision would render the Court a fact finder de novo, exceeding its authority under the statutory scheme which establishes the Court as an appellate body. See 38 U.S.C. § 7261(c).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hensley v. West
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.