Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 VETAPP 504 - Lematta v. Brown

Lematta v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 2002
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Farrar v. Hobby · Hewitt v. Helms · Shalala v. Schaefer · Melkonyan v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d)(1)(A) Except as otherwise provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses ... incurred by that party in any civil action ..., brought by or against the United States in any court having jurisdiction of that action, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. (B) A party seeking an award of fees and other expenses shall, within thirty days of final judgment in the action, submit to the court an application for fees and other expenses which shows that the party is a prevailing party and is eligible to receive an award under this subsection.... The party shall also allege that the position of the United States was not substantially justified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is enough for the Court to make some 'substantive determination in [the] appeal, based upon the record, the parties' pleadings, and the Court's' precedent, that is favorable to the appellant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.