Littell v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1894
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eisenbeis v. Wakeman · Hildebrandt v. Savage · State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The statute under which the appeal was taken contains an express provision to the effect that a party not joining in an appeal shall derive no benefit therefrom except from the necessities of the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cook v. Commellini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.