Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Wash. App. 944 - State v. Murray

8 Wash. App. 944 - State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2003

21 state decisions

1801973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Bumper v. North Carolina · Sedillo v. United States · Harris v. United States · 65 Wash. 2d 530 - In RE McNEAR v. Rhay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he extension of the original justification is legitimate only where it is immediately apparent to the police that they have evidence before them; the “plain view” doctrine may not be used to extend a general exploratory search from one object to another until something incriminating at last emerges.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “‘jealously and carefully drawn,’ and there must be ‘a showing by those who seek exemption . . . that the exigencies of the situation made that course imperative.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Q. When you first went to Apartment 11, did you know what you were looking for? A. We had an idea, yes. Q. Did that include a Sony TV set? A. No. Q. What did you have in mind when you got the consent? A. Sgt. McGougan told me other items had been taken in the high school burglary which had not been recovered; assuming I had seen some of the items in Apartment 1 which consisted of a camera and a little Sony TV set and several tapes, there was supposed to be some calculators and typewriters.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.