8 Wis. 2d 331 - Hooker v. Hooker’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1998
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Seyfert v. Seyfert · Kilmer v. Kilmer · Rohloff v. Rohloff · Sang v. Sang · Shequin v. Shequin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . It is our view that when a party retains an attorney to appear in an action, the party contemplates the usual and ordinary proceedings which may be taken after judgment, and the statutory provisions for appeal and review of the judgment within specified periods from the date of entry, and that in the absence of a substitution or withdrawal of the attorney of record, service of notice upon such attorney is sufficient in all such proceedings and is authorized by sec. 269.37.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a party to an action or proceeding shall have appeared by an attorney the service of papers shall be made upon the attorney. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.