Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

80 A.3d 683

In re Warren E. Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2013

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2013-11-27

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2017

16 state decisions

Relies on In re Brown

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-11-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2 On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, wherein Bar Counsel informs the court that Mr. Brown has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on January 28, 2013, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Brown, 694 A.2d 886 (D.C.1997), it is

¶3 ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

¶4 FURTHER ORDERED that Warren E. Brown, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

/80/a3d/683 · .json · Public domain