Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ariz. 193 - State v. Jordan

State v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
4
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 1998 · most notably State v. Dessureault (1969), Brooks v. Kemp (1985)

8 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

30019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. State of Arizona · State v. Serna · Commonwealth v. Clark · State of Arizona v. MacIas · Cutler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * It is elementary that arguments must be based on facts which the jury is entitled to find from the evidence and not on extraneous matters that were not or could not be received in evidence."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * There was testimony tending to show that the statement to the sheriff and the written statement were voluntary, and hence they were both inadmissible in evidence.” 80 Ariz. at page-200, 294 P.2d at page 682 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““* * * a prosecutor is allowed considerable latitude in a discussion of the evidence, the possible facts the jury-may find and the reasonable inferences that may be drawi;- therefrom.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.