Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 ARK 451 - Strickland v. Strickland

Strickland v. Strickland’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2003 · most notably Bushnell v. Cooper (1919), Narisi v. Narisi (1959)

31 state decisions

7019061910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Womack v. Womack · Danforth v. Danforth · Cate v. Cate · Healy v. Healy · Downer v. Howard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Of course, death terminates a divorce suit; but where property rights depend on the correctness of a divorce decree, and an appeal has been taken from it, it is the duty of the appellate court to review the decree in order to settle the property rights. [Citations] The rule is otherwise where the cause has been submitted to the trial court, and one party dies before decree. No decree can be entered after death of a party to such a suit. [ 80 Ark. at 452 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.