Dyke v. Zaiser’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably 213 Cal. App. 2d 729 - Lingsch v. Savage (1963), Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co. (1983)
3 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 45 Cal. App. 2d 64 - Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp. · 20 Cal. 2d 286 - Rogers v. Warden · Clauser v. Taylor · MacCo Construction Co. v. Fickert · Maxson v. Llewelyn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Many cases have been cited where it has been held that a man is not necessarily required to state everything he knows about the property involved. The present tendency, however, is to class concealment as actual fraud in those cases where the seller knows of facts which materially affect the desirability of the property which he knows are unknown to the buyer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fowler v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.