Eben-King v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
65 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 660 - Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. Rico · Ernst v. Searle · Estate of Hanley v. Hanley · 18 Cal. 3d 365 - In Re Marriage of Skelley · 15 Cal. 4th 51 - Van Beurden Insurance Services v. Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Citations.]' [Citation.] The burden is on the complaining party to establish abuse of discretion, and the showing on appeal is insufficient if it presents a state of facts which simply affords an opportunity for a difference of opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the trial court exceeded the bounds of reason. When two or more inferences can reasonably be deduced from the facts, the reviewing court has no authority to substitute its decision for that of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and in the absence of a clear showing of abuse ... the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.