Bechmann v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2000
2 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hayes v. O'Brien · Cunningham v. Pattee · Tracy v. . Albany Exchange Co. · Sylvis v. Sylvis · Cochrane v. Justice Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘And at the end of the five years, parties of the second part may have the option of the building at what the rent will be worth at that time.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hammond v. Ringstad
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.