Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 F.1d 72 - Hughey v. Sullivan

Hughey v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

80 F. 72 · 1897

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1944
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1944

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

20189719001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Indianapolis and St Louis Railroad Company v. Horst · Vicksburg v. Putnam · Nudd v. Burrows · Dyer v. National Steam Navigation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the [state] Legislature may prescribe any rule of property or any rule of pleading or any rule of practice or any form of procedure, it cannot invade the domain of judgment either of the jury or its presiding judge, and direct what that judgment shall be, in the discharge of the respective or joint functions of either. Those must remain under the federal Constitution, at least, to the government of the common law. It may be inconvenient, and sometimes, possibly, oppressive, that this restriction exists. Originally, the federal Constitution did not contain it as to civil cases, and it was subsequently inserted by the amendments with other similar restrictions upon legislative power; but, wisely or unwisely, it has fixed the common-law trial by jury as that to which we are bound, and only that.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.