Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

80 F.2d 1017

Docket No. 185.

Paniplus Co. v. Higgins

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 17, 1936.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-01-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot · E. Regensburg & Sons v. Higgins

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-01-17

¶1See, also, E. Regensburg & Sons v. Higgins, 79 F.(2d) 516.

¶2Chamberlin, Kafer, Wilds & Jube, of New York City, for complainant.

¶3Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., James W. Morris, Sewall Key, and Andrew W. Sharpe, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (F. W. H. Adams, U. S. Atty., Francis II. Floran and Edward J. Ennis, Asst. U. S. A ttys., and William F. Young, Sp. Asst, to U. S. Atty., all of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

¶4Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. —, January 13, 1936.

/80/f2d/1017 · .json · Public domain