Rhodes v. Kurtz

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 6, 1936.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-01-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1936

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-01-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John N. Landberg, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

¶2Louis S. May, of Lancaster, Pa., for appellee.

¶3Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This case turns on the question whether the petitioner was a farmer and, as such, entitled to the benefit of the federal- statute here involved (Bankr.Act, § 75, as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203). The court below and the referee both found he was not a farmer. Finding ourselves in entire accord with this holding, the order of the court below is affirmed.