Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

80 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 176.

Wheatena Corp. v. Hoey

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 17, 1936.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-01-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot · E. Regensburg & Sons v. Higgins

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-01-17

¶1See, also, E. Regensburg & Sons v. Higgins, 79 F.(2d) 516.

¶2Davis & Wagner, of New York City (Arnold L. Davis, Guy C. Heater, Oscar B. Frazer, and Anselm P. Anderson, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶3Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., James W. Morris, Sewall Key, and Andrew W. Sharpe, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (F. W. H. Adams, U. S. Atty., Francis H. Horan and Edward J. Ennis, Asst. U. S. Attys., and William F. Young, Sp. Asst, to U. S. Atty., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

¶4Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited pendente lite in conformity with the order of the court below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. —, January 13, 1936.

/80/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain