Cutten v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
80 F.2d 140 · 1935
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1 (CFTC Reauthorization Act of 1995) · 7 U.S.C. § 7 · 7 U.S.C. § 8 · 7 U.S.C. § 9
Relies on Caminetti v. United States · Sorrells v. United States · Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · United States v. Wiltberger · United States v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“composed of the Secretary'of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Attorney General,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wallace v. Cutten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.