Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 F.2d 65 - In re Cohn

In re Cohn’s Empirical Analysis

80 F.2d 65 · 1935

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
April 2001
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2001

2 federal appellate ·

5019351940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Automatic Switch Co. · Leschen Sons Rope Company v. Broderick Bascom Rope Company · A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. American Steel & Wire Co. · Mallinson v. Ryan · In re American Circular Loom Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It cannot be successfully argued that patentability of a design may rest on color alone.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.