Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 F.3d 1261 - Moran v. E.k. McDaniel

Moran v. E.k. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis

80 F.3d 1261 · 1996

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
3
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Willie Lee Miles v. Kw Prunty Attorney General of the State of California (1999), Pellegrini v. State (2001)

61 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

5701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schlup v. Delo · McCleskey v. Zant · Barefoot v. Estelle · Godinez v. Moran · Sawyer v. Whitley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may not avoid our holding that a petitioner is not entitled to effective assistance of counsel during habeas proceedings by alleging a due process, rather than a Sixth Amendment, violation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “some objective factor external to the defense impeded counsel's efforts to raise the claim”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Nevada Supreme Court consistently applies its procedural rules to bar review of the merits of an untimely claim in the absence of a showing of cause and lack of prejudice to the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.