King v. Chater

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 1, 1996. Decided March 26, 1996.

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1999

4 counsel of record

Relies on Greiner v. City of Champlin · State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View · Roth v. Homestake Mining Company of California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lionel Henry Peabody, Duluth, MN, for Appellant.

Kelly Rausch Larson, U.S. Social Security Administration, Chicago, IL, for Appellee.

PETITION FOR REHEARING.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We have considered Tom King's petition for rehearing of his appeal. See King v. Chater, 72 F.3d 85 (8th Cir.1995). After carefully examining the district court record, we conclude that Mr. King failed to raise the issue of the invalidity of SSR 86-8, 1986 WL 68636, in the lower court. We therefore deny the petition for rehearing.