Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 F.3d 298 - Hosna v. Groose

Hosna v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis

80 F.3d 298 · 1996

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
November 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Carter v. Arkansas (2004), Mif Realty Rtc v. Rochester Associates (1996)

15 federal appellate · 7 district ·

4301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bell v. Wolfish · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Turner v. Safley · Sandin v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Abuse of discretion occurs if the district court rests its conclusion on clearly erroneous factual findings or if its decision relies on erroneous legal conclusions.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is clearly a legitimate penological objective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.