Zaputil v. Mindel’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2024
3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Allen v. Wright · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn. · United States v. Hays · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he direct, distinct and palpable injury in a criminal sentencing proceeding plainly falls only on the defendant who is being sentenced. It is the defendant and he alone that suffers the direct consequences of a criminal ... sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Congress's purpose in enacting the VWPA was to assist victims in collecting the restitution orders entered by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“marginally related to or inconsistent with the purposes implicit in the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.