Klein v. Zavaras’s Empirical Analysis
80 F.3d 432 · 1996
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Summum v. Callaghan (1997), York v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1996)
12 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Cromwell v. County of Sac · Pomeroy v. Waitkus · Green v. McKaskle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hold Harmless Agreement” was in fact filed with the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on December 30, 2002, it was never given effect by the parties or Judge Covello in that action. To the extent that plaintiff claims that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Penrod v. Norton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.