United States v. Baucum’s Empirical Analysis
80 F.3d 539 · 1996
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Prou v. United States (1999), United States of America v. Ruben Feliciano Nelson Gonzalez (2000)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 21 U.S.C. § 860 (§ 419 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Teague v. Lane · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Ker v. State of California · Engle v. Isaac
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a federal court exercises its power under a presumptively valid federal statute, it acts within its subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to [ 18 U.S.C.] § 3231.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of all offenses against the laws of the United States”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ubject matter jurisdiction presents a threshold question in any federal prosecution,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.