Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 F.3d 989 - Spence v. Johnson

Spence v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

80 F.3d 989 · 1996

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Byrd v. Collins (2000), United States v. Warshak (2010)

43 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

4201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[E]vidence ismaterial only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`[I]nadmissible evidence may be material under Brady.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.