Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 FLA 690 - Williams v. Hines

Williams v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 464 So. 2d 530 - Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co. v. Farish (1985), Dudley v. Harrison, McCready & Co. (1937)

49 state decisions

1101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New Orleans Co v. Jopes · Doremus v. Root · McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. · King v. Chase · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It does not appear to us from the evidence in this case that the plaintiff was negligent, nor is there any plea to this effect; so that there is no question of contributory negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “recover damages from a railroad company.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.