Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 FLA 98 - Neisel v. Moran

Neisel v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
8
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State Ex Rel. Davis v. Rose (1929), Spencer v. Hunt (1933)

52 state decisions

11019191920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co. · Crowley v. Christensen · Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch · California Reduction Company v. Sanitary Reduction Works of San Francisco · Murphy v. People of the State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No law shall take effect until sixty days from the final adjournment of the session of the Legislature at which it may have been enacted, unless otherwise specially provided in such law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “that beyond all reasonable doubt the statute inevitably conflicts with some designated provision of the constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.