Marks v. Calendine’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1995
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1824 · 28 U.S.C. § 1825 · 28 U.S.C. § 1914 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1916 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 1921 · 28 U.S.C. § 1923
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Haines v. Kerner · Cruz v. Beto · Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co. · Gordon v. Leeke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inability of a court or prevailing party to enforce a judgment against one who has no money rather than indicating any shield erected by the grant of in forma pauperis status.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.