Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Haw. 297 - State v. Kwak

State v. Kwak’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2021

23 state decisions

1301995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baehr v. Lewin · State v. Okumura · State v. Aplaca · State v. Hutch · State v. Ortiz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general matter, “permitting or disallowing a party to reopen its case for the purpose of submitting additional evidence is a matter within the discretion of the trial court” and is subject to review for abuse of discretion. Territory v. Rutherford, 41 Haw. 554, 558 (1957). “The trial court abuses its discretion when it clearly exceeds the bounds of reason or disregards rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant.” State v. Furutani 76 Hawai'i 172, 179 , 873 P.2d 51, 58 (1994) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a cardinal rule of statutory construction [which is] that courts are bound to give effect to all parts of a statute, and that no clause, sentence, or word shall be construed as superfluous, void, or insignificant if a construction can be legitimately found which will give force to and preserve all words of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “venue in any criminal matter tried in the district courts of this state will properly lie in any district within the judicial circuit in which the district court is located or to which venue is lawfully transferred”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.