Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Idaho 114 - Fuchs v. Lloyd

Fuchs v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2012

14 state decisions

1001958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Durant v. Snyder · Lanning v. Sprague · Howay v. Howay · Jensen v. Chandler · Webster v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““32-912. * * * But he can not sell, convey or encumber the community real estate unless the wife join with him in executing and acknowledging the deed or other instrument of conveyance, by which the real estate is sold, conveyed or encumbered: *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In Idaho the rule has been long established, and was reiterated in the case of Thomas v. Stevens, 69 Idaho 100 , 203 P.2d 597, 599 , that the contract must be signed and acknowledged by both husband and wife. In that case this Court said: “ ‘It is the long established law of this state that a contract to convey community real property which is not signed and acknowledged by both husband and wife is void. Childs v. Reed, 34 Idaho 450 , 202 P. 685 ; McKinney v. Merritt, 35 Idaho 600 , 208 P. 244 ; Hart v. Turner, 39 Idaho 50 , 226 P. 282 ; Elliott v. Craig, 45 Idaho 15 , 260 P. 433 [additional citations].’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.