Lasher v. Colton’s Empirical Analysis
1899
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1922
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. People · McFarland v. People · Hanke v. Cobiskey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A negligent disregard of an architect’s duty in such respects would he as effectual a defense as a fraudulent one, and it was quite too severe an appli cation of the law to say that he was responsible only for actual fraud comm tted by him. And the instruction should have stated the law correctly, because of one- aspect of the defense that the evidence tended to show, of negligence by the architect concerning the materials and work furnished and done bj one contractor, the Interior Building Company.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dick v. Jullien
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.