Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 ILLAPP2D 136 - Cenco Instruments Corp. v. Thomas

Cenco Instruments Corp. v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In construing a contract and determining the intention of the parties, the instrument should be read and considered as a whole.” Cenco Instruments Corp. v. Thomas, 80 Ill.App.2d 136, 140 , 225 N.E.2d 482 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.