80 Ill. App. 3d 81 - Applegate v. Applegate’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 77 Ill. 2d 414 - In Re Custody of Harne · 78 Ill. 2d 337 - Jarrett v. Jarrett · 69 Ill. App. 3d 97 - Soldner v. Soldner · 68 Ill. App. 3d 284 - Caulkins v. Caulkins · 65 Ill. App. 3d 686 - Canham v. Saisi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(b) The court shall not modify a prior custody judgment unless it finds, upon the basis of facts that have arisen since the prior judgment or that were unknown to the court at the time of entry of the prior judgment, that a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or his custodian and that the modification is necessary to serve the best interest of the child. In applying these standards the court shall retain the custodian appointed pursuant to the prior judgment unless: (1) the custodian agrees to the modification; (2) the child has been integrated into the family of the petitioner with consent of the custodian; or (3) the child’s present environment endangers seriously his physical, mental, moral or emotional health and the harm likely to be caused by a change of environment is outweighed by its advantages to him.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 40, par. 610(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Marriage Gebis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.