Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Mont. 328 - Cobb v. Lee

Cobb v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1955
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hawes v. Oakland · McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co. · Moss v. Goodhart · Allen v. Montana Refining Co. · Kleinschmidt v. American Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * the evidence tends to show that during 1916 two of the plaintiffs, Alphonso Jackman and E.K. Cheadle, were directors, and that there was not a stockholders' meeting after that year. If there were but three directors, Jackman and Cheadle were a majority of the board. If so, they could have called a meeting of the board (section 5944, R.C. 1921) and have taken the requisite action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.