Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 NC 205 - Flynt v. . Bodenhamer

Flynt v. . Bodenhamer’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1977

9 state decisions

3018791880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But the opinion of a well instructed and experienced medical man upon a matter within the scope of his profession, and based on personal observation and knowledge, is and ought to be carefully considered and weighed by the jury in rendering their verdict; and this substantially is the comment of the court.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The law likewise attaches peculiar importance to the opinion of medical men who have the opportunity of observation upon a question of mental capacity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “attended the deceased in his last illness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.