Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 N.C. App. 190 - State v. Hunt

80 N.C. App. 190 - State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Allen (1988), 116 N.C. App. 534 - State v. Westall (1994)

46 state decisions

2601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Foust · State v. Jones · 78 N.C. App. 753 - State v. Daye · State v. Hunter · Williams v. Bethany Volunteer Fire Department

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[w]hen . . . there is some evidence as to the appropriate amount of restitution, the recommendation will not be overruled on appeal.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he admissibility of demonstrative or experimental evidence depends as much, as for any other piece of evidence, upon whether its probative value is outweighed by the potential undue prejudicial effect it may have on defendant's case. See Rule 403, N.C. Rules Evid. In the case of a courtroom demonstration, the demonstrator may not need to be qualified as an expert in the same way as an experimentor, but a proper foundation still must be laid as to the person's familiarity with the thing he or she is demonstrating.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a test made to demonstrate a known truth, to examine the validity of a hypothesis, or to determine the efficacy of something previously untried.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.