80 N.C. App. 79 - Mobley v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2019
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Summey v. Cauthen · Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance · Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. Park · Chaffin v. Brame · Butner v. . Spease
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“produced more than a scintilla of evidence, taking the record in the light most favorable to [him] and [giving him the benefit of] every favorable inference [from the evidence he presented]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[M]eaningless assertions which amount to little more than choosing up sides' are properly excludable as lacking helpfulness under the Rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“allows admission of lay opinion evidence on ultimate issues, but to qualify for admission the opinion must be helpful to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.