McCauley v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 135 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably California First Bank v. State (1990), Lujan v. Gonzales (1972)
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 135 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Washington Gas Light Co. v. Lansden · Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors Company · 39 Cal. 2d 622 - Flores v. Brown · Frei v. Brownlee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Failure to object to the admission of evidence constitutes a waiver of objection, and in such case the objection cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzales v. Shaw · Bloom v. Lewis“to some county free from exception: (2) when the party moving for a change files in the case an affidavit of himself, his agent or attorney, that he believes he cannot obtain a fair trial in the county in which the case is pending because: (a) the adverse party has undue influence over the minds of the inhabitants of the county; or (b) the inhabitants of the county are prejudiced against the party; or (c) because of public excitement or local prejudice in the county in regard to the case or the questions involved therein, an impartial jury cannot be obtained in the county to try the case; or (d) any other cause stated in the affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. House“"Although control or right to control the physical conduct of the person giving service is important and in many situations is determinative, the control or right to control needed to establish the relation of master and servant may be very attenuated. In some types of cases which involve persons customarily considered as servants, there may even be an understanding that the employer shall not exercise control. Thus, the full-time cook is regarded as a servant although it is understood that the employer will exercise no control over the cooking."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Madsen v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.