Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 N.M. 274 - State v. Lewis

State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
4
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently April 1999 · most notably State v. Gutierrez (1993), State v. Torres (1970)

2 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

5301969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In appropriate circumstances and in an appropriate manner, a police officer may approach a person to investigate possible criminal behavior even though the officer may not have probable cause for an arrest. To justify such an invasion of a citizen's personal security, the police officer must be able to specify facts which, together with rational inferences therefrom, reasonably warrant the intrusion. These facts are to be judged by an objective standard — would the facts available to the officer warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe the action taken was appropriate? Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Slicker, 79 N.M. 677 , 448 P.2d 478 (Ct.App. 1968).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.