Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 N.M. 275 - Speckner v. Riebold

Speckner v. Riebold’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2020

2 district · 18 state decisions

80197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Otto-Johnson Mercantile Co. v. Garcia · Betz v. Tower Savings Bank · 79 N.J. Super. 47 - 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarco · National Reserve Life Insurance v. Kemp · Cooper v. Brownfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judgment of foreclosure is always final in part and interlocutory in part; final as to determining the rights of the plaintiff under the mortgage; interlocutory with respect to the sale; final as to the amounts to be paid to the mortgagor; interlocutory with respect to the legality of the proceedings upon the sale, the proper distribution of the proceeds thereof and as to any rights in the distribution of any surplus.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was merely a step in proper subsequent proceedings to enforce the judgment already rendered. The personal indebtedness of the defendants had already been adjudged. The amount for which execution should issue was alone left to be determined, and that by mere computation. We cannot see how the motion for entry of deficiency judgment can be considered as a new judgment, or as a modification of the original “final decree,” any more than a motion to confirm the master’s report of sale should be so considered. An order of confirmation is a “final order affecting a substantial right made after the entry of a final judgment.” So, also, an order in proceedings supplementary to execution. So we must classify an order determining, after foreclosure sale, the amount of deficiency to be entered as a personal judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.