Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 N.M. 340 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
4
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably State v. Vogenthaler (1976), Wilson v. Denver (1998)

2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions

510196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · 50 Cal. 2d 383 - People v. Wein · Morgan v. Ohio · State v. Nance · State v. Lowry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the unlawful taking, restraining or confining of a person, by force or deception, with intent that the victim be held io service against the victim’s will.” [Our emphasis].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(1) be held for ransom; “(2) as a hostage, confined against his will; or “(3) be held to service against the victim’s will.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Kidnaping is the unlawful taking, restraining or confining of a person, by force or deception .... [We are not] persuaded that 'force' should be construed to mean violent or deadly force, as might be suggested. It could not have been the legislative intention to so limit the statute, for, many kidnappings are accomplished by the use of only minimal force, as, for example, where a child is abducted.”). 10 . See Miranda-Ortegon, 670 F.3d at 663 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.