State v. Alberts’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably State v. Gommenginger (1990), State v. Bullcoming (2010)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Michelson v. United States · State v. Rowell · State v. Mason · Smith v. United States · State v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]xtrajudicial statements . . . may properly be received into evidence, not for the truth of the assertions therein contained, . . . but for such legitimate purposes as that of . . . effect on the hearer. . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rosales · State v. Johnson“to establish the reason for investigation and to show probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Otto“was clearly hearsay and clearly prejudicial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Otto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.