State v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Lobb · 2 Ariz. App. 510 - State v. Martin · State v. Reid · 2 Ariz. App. 232 - State v. Rogers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A distinction is made between “amendment to an information” and “an amended information.” State v. Martin, 2 Ariz. App. 510 , 410 P.2d 132 (Ct.App.1966); State v. Rogers, 2 Ariz.App. 232 , 407 P.2d 773 (Ct.App.1965). * * * Unless prejudice to the defendant results a reviewing court will not disturb the trial court’s discretion in permitting an amended information. People v. Moore, 21 Ill. App.2d 9 , 157 N.E.2d 94 (Ct.App.1959).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Benally
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.