80 Ohio App. 3d 113 - State v. Uhler’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

28 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “existence of prurient motivations may be discerned from the type, nature and circumstances of the contact, along with the personality of the defendant.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Barrett, Unpublished Decision (9-5-2006) · State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (9-16-2004)

2. “[e]very person is competent to be a witness except * * * children under ten years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts and transactions respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Z.C., Unpublished Decision (10-13-2006) · State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (10-2-2006)

3. ““No person shall have sexual contact with another, not the spouse of the offender; cause another not the spouse of the offender to have sexual contact with the offender; or cause two or more other persons to have sexual contact when any of the following applies: $ * “(4) The other person, or one of the other persons, is less than thirteen years of age, whether or not the offender knows the age of such person.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 116 Ohio App. 3d 441 - In Re Anderson