Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 141 - Lumaye v. Johnson

80 Ohio App. 3d 141 - Lumaye v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2024

17 state decisions

801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 142 Ohio St. 91 - Lester v. Leuck · 127 Ohio St. 147 - Morris v. Bloomgreen · Deming v. Osinski · 47 Ohio App. 3d 15 - Hubner v. Sigall · Timmins v. Russomano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The driver of a vehicle lawfully approaching from the right has the right to assume that the driver of the vehicle approaching from the left will obey the law by yielding the right of way. If however the former, just as he is approaching or entering the intersection, discovers that the latter is not yielding the right of way and has thereby placed himself in a perilous situation, it becomes the duty of the former to use ordinary care not to injure the latter after becoming aware of his perilous situation.’ ” Morris v. Bloomgren (1933), 127 Ohio St. 147 , 187 N.E. 2 , paragraph five of the syllabus; Lumaye v. Johnson (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 141, 143 , 608 N.E.2d 1108, 1109 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is the well-settled rule that a party will not be permitted to take advantage of an error which he himself invited or induced the trial court to make. * * * `[A] litigant cannot be permitted, either intentionally or unintentionally, to induce or mislead a court into the commission of an error and then procure a reversal of the judgment for an error for which he was actively responsible.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to proceed uninterruptedly in a lawful manner in the direction in which it * * * is moving in preference to another vehicle * * * approaching from a different direction into its * * * path; * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.