80 Ohio App. 3d 21 - Flint v. Holbrook’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 125 Ohio App. 3d 294 - Burgess v. Tackas (1998), 88 Ohio App. 3d 220 - Khamis v. Everson (1993)
68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 44 Cal. App. 3d 504 - Uccello v. Laudenslayer · 151 Ohio St. 316 - Cooper v. Roose · 5 Ohio App. 3d 179 - Garrard v. McComas · 20 Ohio App. 3d 21 - Blue Ash Building & Loan Co. v. Hahn · Morgan v. Mason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'one who has possession and control of the premises where the dog lives, and silently acquiesces to the dog's presence.'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“the focus shifts from possession and control over the dog to possession and control of the premises where the dog lives.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under common law, a plaintiff suing for injuries inflicted by a dog must show that the defendant owned or harbored the dog, that the dog was vicious, that the defendant knew of the dog's viciousness, and that the defendant was negligent in keeping the dog.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.