Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 231 - Leigh v. Crescent Square, Ltd.

80 Ohio App. 3d 231 - Leigh v. Crescent Square, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
6
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably 138 Ohio App. 3d 244 - Schafer v. Rms Realty (2000), 67 Cal. App. 4th 1509 - Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison (1998)

26 state decisions

1901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co. · 61 Ohio App. 3d 127 - Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga Apartments · Latta v. Kilbourn · Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co. · Rolf v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “More importantly, even with evaluating the evidence in the light most favorable to Heller, the evidence shows that the Executive Committee expelled Heller because of a loss of trust in him. "The foundation of a professional relationship is personal confidence and trust. Once a schism develops, its magnitude may be exaggerated rightfully or wrongfully to the point of destroying a harmonious accord. When such occurs, an expeditious severance is desirable...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court did not accept the plaintiffs’ argument that the agreement contained implied provisions of due process, pointing out that all of the partners, including the plaintiffs, had signed the agreement without including such provisions, and that the expulsion was not initiated in order for the remaining partners to extract financial gain.” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 288 , 608 N.E.2d at 1170 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Taking into account the general partners' past problems and the previous litigation wherein Leigh was found to have acted in contravention of the partnership's best interests, the ouster was instituted in good faith and for legitimate business purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.