Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 246 - Bross v. Smith

80 Ohio App. 3d 246 - Bross v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2024

11 state decisions

601992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell · Padilla-Martinez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any firsthand knowledge of a writing, however acquired, is an appropriate basis for testimony on the issue of authentication where the testimony logically connects the documents with the issues of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “personal prediction or hyperbolic characterization,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.