Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 470 - State v. McKinney

80 Ohio App. 3d 470 - State v. McKinney’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Scott · United States v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'states are separate sovereigns with respect to the federal government.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The dual sovereignty doctrine is founded on the common-law conception of crime as an offense against the sovereignty of the government. When a defendant in a single act violates the `peace and dignity' of two sovereigns by breaking the laws of each, he has committed two distinct `offences [sic].'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] defendant may be subjected to successive trials at both the state and federal levels for the same act or offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.